There was no reason to make this film. Just because you can doesnt mean you should. Surprisingly, this cheap cash-in hit theaters before the 3D craze, but its performance matched its quality. Now, the zombie make-up isnt as bad as many would lead you to believe, and there are a few moderate gore scenes, but make no mistake that this is a terrible, terrible film. There isnt a single unscripted or relateable character in the entire cast, and there certainly arent any significant changes made to the plot that warrant a third attempt on the original. Though this viewing was in ground-breaking 2D instead of the intended 3D, the gimmicky trend should only serve to enhance the viewing experience rather than having the entire film rely on it. Since it wasnt any good in 2D, one can only assume it would have been bad in 3D outside of a few presumably underwhelming effects. The film should have been called "NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD 3F." Fail. Zombie films that are worse than it: RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD 4, HOUSE OF THE DEAD 2. Films that are better: All.
Number of views: 1.