The Lovely Bones (2009)

The spirit of a young girl is trapped in her own personal purgatory until she is able to assist her father and sister in tracking down the man responsible for murdering her and several other teens. Oscar®-winner Peter Jackson adapts his extraordinary visual style seen earlier in THE LORD OF THE RINGS and KING KONG to bring Susie's ethereal world to life as she crosses between two planes of reality while attempting to expose her killer. Jackson's imaginative fantasy worlds succeed from a visual standpoint, however his kinetic filming is smothered with constantly-sweeping camera movements that are overly dramatic and completely unnecessary. Alice Sebold's heart-felt characters are realized by the considerable cast, with Saoirse Ronan standing out above all others as the fading Susie. While Stanley Tucci manages to create the creepy and uncomfortable persona that the role of Mr. Harvey required, many of the awkward mannerisms he brings with him make it difficult to accept his character completely. Unfortunately, the motion-picture adaptation lacks the same level of suspense and heightened emotional response present in the novel. Had it been structured differently with a quickened pace and darker tone, it may have proven to be far more effective. Even still, THE LOVELY BONES offers a harrowing story built on strong characters and performances that should appeal to fans of the written work and newcomers as well.

Rating: 8/10.
Number of views: 1.

If you liked THE LOVELY BONES, check out:

HorrorBlips: vote it up!


  1. Well I knew it would happen eventually, but I disagree with you. I was hugely disappointed with the film. I was optimistic about seeing it despite the negative reviews because I hoped he'd bring a little of the Heavenly Creatures vibe to it.

    I loved the book, but Peter Jackson's version mangled the story. It wasn't even the huge changes that bothered me, it was the little inconsequential ones. And while some of the fantasy elements are pretty to look at, he makes it seem a little too final fantasy-ish for me.

    Parts of it are great, but the whole thing just seemed messy.

  2. Nice review. I suppose I'll check it out after reading this. I was going to skip it. I did read the book in high school and so I'm kind of curious to see how it plays out.

    Oh Peter Jackson and his swooping camera....please come back to splat-stick.

  3. Its definitely not without its problems, but if I were coming at it from an outsider's perspective, I would have to consider it a decent enough film. Jurassic Park made drastic changes in the film version, but it is still one of the all time greats. Inconsequential to this topic? Probably. But I didnt find myself bored here at least =D